home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Path: news.thomson-lcr.fr!demailly
- From: demailly@thomson-lcr.fr (Gilles Demailly)
- Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- X-Nntp-Posting-Host: morphee
- Message-ID: <DnuGrG.JrE@news.thomson-lcr.fr>
- To: c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku)
- Sender: news@news.thomson-lcr.fr
- Organization: Thomson-CSF, Laboratoire Central de Recherches, Orsay, France
- References: <JSA.96Feb16135027@organon.com> <4hg92vINNnat@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <313C758E.18B2@lfwc.lockheed.com> <313D4D00.875@ix.netcom.com> <4hjm02INN3mt@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 1996 11:47:40 GMT
-
-
- In article <4hjm02INN3mt@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca>, c2a192@ugrad.cs.ubc.ca (Kazimir Kylheku) writes:
- |>
- |> Why don't they just get Ada then? If the Usenet lunatics are right, Ada
- |> can do what you mean no matter what crap you write. It can even correct bit
-
- as a matter of fact, Ada won't let you write crap.
-
- --Gilles
-